Contact Us

Central Falls City Hall Hours

Monday-Thursday: 8:30 am -4:30 pm

Friday: 8:30 am -1:30 pm

*Extended hours every 3rd Thursday of the month, 8:30 am - 7 pm

580 Broad Street

Central Falls, RI 02863


Central Falls Department of Public Works

Monday-Thursday: 7:00 am - 3:00 pm

Friday: 7:00 am - 12:00 pm

1280 High Street

Central Falls, RI 02863



Mayor's Office (401) 727-7474

City Clerk (401) 727-7400............................................

Fire Department (401) 727-7446.................................

Police Department (401) 727-7411..............................

Code Enforcement (401) 727-7460..............................

Finance (401) 727-7470................................................

Human Resources (401) 727-7405...............................

Legal (401) 727-7490...................................................

Board of Canvass (401)

Tax Assessor (401) 727-7430......................................

Parks & Recreation (401) 727-7455..............................

Planning & Economic Development (401) 727-7480...

Public Works (401) 727-7466.......................................

Purchasing (401) 727-7400 x6......................................

Showing 24 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Joseph Faria
    We’ve got a problem with the property at 120 Chestnut St. I get it that it doesn’t meet fire code and the woman who owns it has a dilemma in trying to get rid of the place. But is that an excuse to not seal the place up ? Windows are missing and open. Birds, squirrels, and vermin are over running the place, it’s ripe for arson, a big concern ! As I write this, there is a bird trapped in one of the half boarded up windows two days now that’s starving to death in front of all of us. I get that there’s a problem with codes as far as the financial aspect goes and she’s chosen to abandon the place, but can she at least seal the place up sufficiently ?? Or should we all just look away and write it off. It’s not rocket science to seal the broken windows and gaps under the overhead doors, nor should it require any big expense. Please look into this ! She may have gotten a lemon, but that’s no reason to burden us with sour grapes…thank you, 120 Chestnut St., the old Woodridge building.
  • Luis Alicea
    I live in 312 Cowden st.
    Im interesed to get 2 more trash can. How i can get?
  • Edward Williams Jen Pike
    Dear Town Council Members:
    The FCC is moving quickly to remove localities’ authority over the installation of 5G. Its beyond comprehension as to why they are totally closed to what scientists are saying and the documented danger of millimeter frequency. We think and assume that if its available, it must be safe. Humanity is being romanced with a bombardment of commercials into believing that this technology is the next step in our evolution.
    Included below are excerpts from The International 5G Space Appeal, which as of March 1, 2019, has 53,964 signatories from 168 countries.
    “The evidence that radio frequency (RF) radiation is harmful to life is already overwhelming. The accumulated clinical evidence of sick and injured human beings, experimental evidence of damage to DNA, cells and organ systems in a wide variety of plants and animals, and epidemiological evidence that the major diseases of modern civilization—cancer, heart disease and diabetes—are in large part caused by electromagnetic pollution, forms a literature base of well over 10,000 peer-reviewed studies.”
    “If the telecommunications industry’s plans for 5G come to fruition, no person, no animal, no bird, no insect and no plant on Earth will be able to avoid exposure, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to levels of RF radiation that are tens to hundreds of times greater than what exists today, without any possibility of escape anywhere on the planet. These 5G plans threaten to provoke serious, irreversible effects on humans and permanent damage to all of the Earth’s ecosystems.”
    Your understanding and appropriation of this matter holds the very key to maintaining our basic biology as well as the ecology of the planet. Its a pivotal turning point. Thank you from the bottom of our hearts for taking the time to read this and to understand this powerful, thoughtful documents and to execute your local rights for the greatest good.
    Very truly,
    Concerned Citizens of Providence


    To the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe
    and Governments of all Nations
    We the undersigned scientists, doctors, environmental organizations and citizens from (__) countries, urgently call for a halt to the deployment of the 5G (fifth generation) wireless network, including 5G from space satellites. 5G will massively increase exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation on top of the 2G, 3G and 4G networks for telecommunications already in place. RF radiation has been proven harmful for humans and the environment. The deployment of 5G constitutes an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a crime under international law.

    Executive summary
    Telecommunications companies worldwide, with the support of governments, are poised within the next two years to roll out the fifth-generation wireless network (5G). This is set to deliver what is acknowledged to be unprecedented societal change on a global scale. We will have “smart” homes, “smart” businesses, “smart” highways, “smart” cities, and self-driving cars. Virtually everything we own and buy, from refrigerators and washing machines to milk cartons, hairbrushes and infants’ diapers, will contain antennas and microchips as a means to connect wirelessly to the Internet. Every person will have instant access to super-high-speed, low-latency wireless communications from any point on the planet including rainforests, mid-ocean, and the Antarctic.
    What is not widely acknowledged is that this will also result in unprecedented environmental change on a global scale. The planned density of radio frequency transmitters is impossible to envisage. In addition to millions of new 5G base stations on Earth and 20,000 new satellites in space, 200 billion transmitting objects, according to estimates, will be part of the Internet of Things by 2020, and one trillion objects a few years later. Commercial 5G at lower frequencies and slower speeds was deployed in Qatar, Finland and Estonia in mid-2018. The rollout of 5G at extremely high (millimetre wave) frequencies is planned to begin at the end of 2018.
    Despite widespread denial, the evidence that radio frequency (RF) radiation is harmful to life is already overwhelming. The accumulated clinical evidence of sick and injured human beings, experimental evidence of damage to DNA, cells and organ systems in a wide variety of plants and animals, and epidemiological evidence that the major diseases of modern civilization—cancer, heart disease and diabetes—are in large part caused by electromagnetic pollution, forms a literature base of well over 10,000 peer-reviewed studies.
    If the telecommunications industry’s plans for 5G come to fruition, no person, no animal, no bird, no insect and no plant on Earth will be able to avoid exposure, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to levels of RF radiation that are tens to hundreds of times greater than what exists today, without any possibility of escape anywhere on the planet. These 5G plans threaten to provoke serious, irreversible effects on humans and permanent damage to all of the Earth’s ecosystems.
    Immediate measures must be taken to protect humanity and the environment, in accordance with ethical imperatives and international agreements.

    Ground-based 5G
    In order to transmit the enormous amounts of data required for the Internet of Things (IoT), 5G technology, when fully deployed, will use millimeter waves, which are poorly transmitted through solid material. This will require every carrier to install base stations every 100 meters in every urban area in the world. Unlike previous generations of wireless technology, in which a single antenna broadcasts over a wide area, 5G base stations and 5G devices will have multiple antennas in “phased arrays” that work together to emit focused, steerable, laser-like beams that track each other.
    Each 5G phone will contain dozens of tiny antennas, all working together to track and aim a narrowly focused beam at the nearest cell tower. The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has adopted rules permitting the effective power of those beams to be as much as 20 watts, ten times more powerful than the levels permitted for current phones.
    Each 5G base station will contain hundreds or thousands of antennas aiming multiple laser-like beams simultaneously at all cell phones and user devices in its service area. This technology is called “multiple input multiple output” or MIMO. FCC rules permit the effective radiated power of a 5G base station’s beams to be as much as 30,000 watts per 100 MHz of spectrum, or equivalently 300,000 watts per GHz of spectrum, tens to hundreds of times more powerful than the levels permitted for current base stations.

    Space-based 5G
    At least five companies are proposing to provide 5G from space from a combined 20,000 satellites in low- and medium-Earth orbit that will blanket the Earth with powerful, focused, steerable beams. Each satellite will emit millimeter waves with an effective radiated power of up to 5 million watts from thousands of antennas arranged in a phased array. Although the energy reaching the ground from satellites will be less than that from ground-based antennas, it will irradiate areas of the Earth not reached by other transmitters and will be additional to ground-based 5G transmissions from billions of IoT objects. Even more importantly, the satellites will be located in the Earth’s magnetosphere, which exerts a significant influence over the electrical properties of the atmosphere. The alteration of the Earth’s electromagnetic environment may be an even greater threat to life than the radiation from ground-based antennas (see below).

    Harmful effects of radio frequency radiation are already proven
    Even before 5G was proposed, dozens of petitions and appeals by international scientists, including the Freiburger Appeal signed by over 3,000 physicians, called for a halt to the expansion of wireless technology and a moratorium on new base stations.
    In 2015, 215 scientists from 41 countries communicated their alarm to the United Nations (UN) and World Health Organization (WHO). They stated that “numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF [electromagnetic fields] affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines”. More than 10,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies demonstrate harm to human health from RF radiation. Effects include: alteration of heart rhythm, altered gene expression, altered metabolism, altered stem cell development, cancers, cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, DNA damage, impacts on general well-being, increased free radicals, learning and memory deficits, impaired sperm function and quality, miscarriage, neurological damage, obesity and diabetes, and oxidative stress. Effects in children include autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and asthma.
    Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is abundant evidence of harm to diverse plant and wildlife including: ants, birds, forests, frogs, fruit flies, honey bees, insects, mammals, mice, plants, rats, and trees. Negative microbiological effects have also been recorded.
    The WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded in 2011 that RF radiation of frequencies 30 kHz – 300 GHz are possibly carcinogenic to humans “Group 2”. However, recent evidence, including the latest studies on cell phone use and brain cancer risks, indicate that RF radiation is proven carcinogenic to humans and should now be classified as a “Group 1 carcinogen” along with tobacco smoke and asbestos.
    Most contemporary wireless signals are pulse-modulated. Harm is caused by both the high-frequency carrier wave and the low-frequency pulsations.

    The deployment of 5G satellites must be prohibited
    The Earth, the ionosphere and the lower atmosphere form the global electric circuit in which we live. It is well established that biological rhythms—of humans, birds, hamsters, and spiders—are controlled by the Earth’s natural electromagnetic environment and that the well-being of all organisms depends on the stability of this environment, including the electrical properties of the atmosphere.Cherry, in a groundbreaking paper, explained the importance of the Schumann resonances and why ionospheric disturbances can alter blood pressure and melatonin and cause “cancer, reproductive, cardiac and neurological disease and death”.
    These elements of our electromagnetic environment have already been altered by radiation from power lines. Power line harmonic radiation reaches the Earth’s ionosphere and magnetosphere, where it is amplified by wave-particle interactions. In 1985, Dr. Robert O. Becker warned that power line harmonic radiation had already changed the structure of the magnetosphere, and that the continued expansion of this effect “threatens the viability of all life on Earth”. The placement of tens of thousands of satellites directly in both the ionosphere and magnetosphere, emitting modulated signals at millions of watts and millions of frequencies, is likely to alter our electromagnetic environment beyond our ability to adapt.
    Informal monitoring has already provided evidence indicating serious effects on humans and animals from the approximately 100 satellites that have provided 2G and 3G phone service from low orbit since 1998. Such effects cannot be understood only from consideration of the low levels of radiation on the ground. Knowledge from other relevant scientific disciplines must be taken into account, including the fields of atmospheric physics and acupuncture. Adding 20,000 5G satellites will further pollute the global electric circuit and could alter the Schumann resonances, with which all life on Earth has evolved. The effects will be universal and may be profoundly damaging.

    5G is qualitatively and quantitatively different from 4G
    The idea that we will tolerate tens to hundreds of times more radiation at millimeter wavelengths is based on faulty modelling of the human body as a shell filled with a homogeneous liquid. The assumption that millimeter waves do not penetrate beyond the skin completely ignores nerves, blood vessels, and other electrically conducting structures that can carry radiation-induced currents deep into the body. Another, potentially more serious error is that phased arrays are not ordinary antennas. When an ordinary electromagnetic field enters the body, it causes charges to move and currents to flow; however, when extremely short electromagnetic pulses enter the body, something else happens: the moving charges themselves become little antennas that reradiate the electromagnetic field and send it deeper into the body. These reradiated waves are called Brillouin precursors. They become significant when either the power or the phase of the waves changes rapidly enough. 5G will probably satisfy both criteria.
    In addition, shallow penetration in itself poses a unique danger to eyes and to the largest organ of the body, the skin, as well as to very small creatures. Peer-reviewed studies have recently been published predicting thermal skin burns in humans from 5G radiation and resonant absorption by insects, which absorb up to 100 times as much radiation at millimeter wavelengths as they do at wavelengths presently in use. Since populations of flying insects have declined by 75-80 per cent since 1989, even in protected nature areas 5G radiation could have catastrophic effects on insect populations worldwide. A 1986 study by Om Gandhi warned that millimeter waves are strongly absorbed by the cornea of the eye, and that ordinary clothing, being of millimetre-size thickness, increases the absorption of energy by the skin by a resonance-type effect. Russell (2018) reviews the known effects of millimeter waves on skin, eyes (including cataracts), heart rate, immune system and DNA.

    Regulators have deliberately excluded the scientific evidence of harm
    Stakeholders thus far in the development of 5G have been industry and governments, while renowned international EMF scientists who have documented biological effects on humans, animals, insects and plants, and the alarming effects on health and the environment in thousands of peer-reviewed studies have been excluded. The reason for the current inadequate safety guidelines is that conflicts of interest of standard-setting bodies “due to their relationships with telecommunications or electric companies undermine the impartiality that should govern the regulation of Public Exposure Standards for non-ionizing radiation”. Professor Emeritus Martin L. Pall lays out the conflicts of interest in detail and the lists of important studies that have been excluded, in his literature review.

    The thermal hypothesis is obsolete—new safety standards are needed
    Current safety guidelines are based on the obsolete hypothesis that heating is the only harmful effect of EMFs. As Markov and Grigoriev have stated, “Today standards do not consider the real pollution of the environment with nonionizing radiation”. Hundreds of scientists, including many signatories to this appeal, have proven that many different kinds of acute and chronic illnesses and injuries are caused without heating (“non-thermal effect”) from radiation levels far below international guidelines. Biological effects occur even at near-zero power levels. Effects that have been found at 0.02 picowatts (trillionths of a watt) per square centimetre or less include altered genetic structure in E. coli and in rats, altered EEG in humans, growth stimulation in bean plants, and stimulation of ovulation in chickens.
    To protect against non-thermal effects, duration of exposure must be considered. 5G will expose everyone to many more transmissions simultaneously and continuously, day and night without cessation. New safety standards are needed and should be based on cumulative exposure and not only on power levels but also on frequency, bandwidth, modulation, waveform, pulse width and other properties that are biologically important. Antennas must be confined to specific, publicly identified locations. To protect humans, antennas must be located far from where people live and work, and excluded from the public rights-of-way where people walk. To protect wildlife, they must be excluded from wilderness sanctuaries and strictly minimized in remote areas of the Earth. To protect all life, commercial communications satellites must be limited in number and prohibited in low- and medium-Earth orbits. Phased arrays must be prohibited on Earth and in space.

    RF radiation has both acute and chronic effects
    RF radiation has both immediate and long-term effects. Cancer and heart disease are examples of long-term effects. Alteration of heart rhythm and changes in brain function are examples of immediate effects. A syndrome that was called radiowave sickness in the former Soviet Union and is called electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) around the world today can be either acute or chronic. Professor Dr. Karl Hecht has published a detailed history of these syndromes, compiled from a review of more than 1,500 Russian scientific papers and the clinical histories of more than 1,000 of his own patients in Germany. Objective findings include sleep disorders, abnormal blood pressure and heart rate, digestive disorders, hair loss, tinnitus and skin rash. Subjective symptoms include dizziness, nausea, headache, memory loss, inability to concentrate, fatigue, flu-like symptoms and cardiac pain.
    The EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 states that EHS develops when people are “continuously exposed in their daily life” to increasing levels of EMFs, and that “reduction and prevention of EMF exposure” is necessary to restore these patients to health. EHS should no longer be considered a disease, but an injury by a toxic environment that affects an increasingly large portion of the population, estimated already at 100 million people worldwide, and that may soon affect everyone if the worldwide rollout of 5G is permitted.
    The International Scientific Declaration on EHS and multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), Brussels, declared in 2015 that inaction is a cost to society and is not an option any more… We unanimously acknowledge this serious hazard to public health… [urgently requiring] that major primary prevention measures are adopted and prioritized, to face this worldwide pan-epidemic in perspective” (emphasis added).

    World governments are failing in their duty of care to the populations they govern
    In their haste to implement 5G and to encourage the unconstrained use of outer space, the European Union, United States, and national governments worldwide are taking steps to ensure a “barrier-free” regulatory environment. They are prohibiting local authorities from enforcing environmental laws, and “in the interest of speedy and cost-effective deployment”, removing “unnecessary burdens… such as local planning procedures [and] the variety of specific limits on electromagnetic field (EMF) emissions and of the methods required to aggregate them”.
    Governments are also enacting laws to make wireless facilities a permitted use in all public rights-of-way. To date, most wireless facilities have been located on private property at some distance from homes and businesses. In order for them to be spaced less than 100 meters apart as required by 5G, however, they will now be located on the sidewalk directly in front of homes and businesses and close above the heads of pedestrians, including mothers with babies.
    Public notice requirements and public hearings are being eliminated. Even if there were a hearing and 100 scientific experts were to testify against 5G, laws have been passed making it illegal for local authorities to take their testimony into consideration. US law, for example, prohibits local governments from regulating wireless technology “on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency radiation”, and courts have reversed regulatory decisions about cell tower placement simply because most of the public testimony was about health. Insurers will not provide coverage against EMF risks, and there is zero clarity as to what entity will bear legal responsibility for damage to life, limb and property arising from exposure to 5G, whether ground- or space-based.
    In the absence of an agreed comprehensive legal regime governing activities in outer space, legal liability for those activities is non-existent, despite the prospect of whole continents, the atmosphere and the oceans being put at risk by them.

    International agreements are being violated
    Children and duty of care
    The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: States shall “undertake to ensure the child such protection and care as is necessary for his or her well-being”, “ensure… the survival and development of the child” and “take appropriate measures to combat disease… taking into consideration the dangers and risks of environmental pollution”.
    The Nuremberg Code (1947) applies to all experiments on humans, thus including the deployment of 5G with new, higher RF radiation exposure that has not been pre-market tested for safety. “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential”. Exposure to 5G will be involuntary. “No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur”. The findings of over 10,000 scientific studies and the voices of hundreds of international organizations representing hundreds of thousands of members who have suffered disabling injury and been displaced from their homes by already-existing wireless telecommunications facilities, are “a priori reasons to believe that death or disabling injury will occur”.

    Duty to inform and EMFs
    The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (2012) of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) stated that “[t]here is a need to inform the public of the potential effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs)” and invited Member States “to adopt suitable measures in order to ensure compliance with relevant international recommendations to protect health against the adverse effect of EMF”.
    The Mid-term review of the European Environment and Health Action Plan 2004-2010 (2008): “The European Parliament… [n]otes that the limits on exposure to electromagnetic fields which have been set for the general public are obsolete, … obviously take no account of developments in information and communication technologies, of the recommendations issued by the European Environment Agency or of the stricter emission standards adopted, for example, by Belgium, Italy, and Austria, and do not address the issue of vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women, newborn babies, and children.”
    Resolution 1815 (Council of Europe, 2011): “Take all reasonable measures to reduce exposure to electromagnetic fields, especially to radio frequencies from mobile phones, and particularly the exposure to children and young people.”

    The Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (1972): “The discharge of toxic substances… in such quantities or concentrations as to exceed the capacity of the environment to render them harmless, must be halted in order to ensure that serious or irreversible damage is not inflicted upon ecosystems”.
    The World Charter for Nature (1982): “Activities which are likely to cause irreversible damage to nature shall be avoided… [W]here potential adverse effects are not fully understood, the activities should not proceed”.
    The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992): “States have… the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction”.
    The United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development (2002): “There is an urgent need to… create more effective national and regional policy responses to environmental threats to human health”.
    The African Convention on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (2017): “The Parties shall… take all appropriate measures to prevent, mitigate and eliminate to the maximum extent possible, detrimental effects on the environment, in particular from radioactive, toxic, and other hazardous substances and wastes".

    Health and human rights
    The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person”.
    The United Nations Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health(2016-2030) has as objectives and targets to “transform”, by expanding enabling environments; to “survive”, by reducing maternal and newborn mortality; and to “thrive” by ensuring health and well-being and reducing pollution-related deaths and illnesses.

    The Outer Space Treaty (1967) requires that the use of outer space be conducted “so as to avoid [its] harmful contamination and also adverse changes in the environment of the Earth”.
    The United Nations Guidelines for The Long-Term Sustainability of Outer Space Activities (2018): “States and international intergovernmental organizations should address… risks to people, property, public health and the environment associated with the launch, in-orbit operation and re-entry of space objects”.

    World governments are playing dice with life on Earth
    Albert Einstein famously asserted that “God does not play dice”. Yet by pursuing the broadcast on Earth and from space of 5G, an unprecedented technology of millimeter waves previously used as an energy weapon in military operations and crowd control, world governments are recklessly playing dice with the future of life on Earth.
    To refuse to accept and apply relevant and valid scientific knowledge is ethically unacceptable. Existing research shows that 5G—and especially space-based 5G—contravenes principles enshrined in a host of international agreements.

    We call upon the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe and governments of all nations,
    (a) To take immediate measures to halt the deployment of 5G on Earth and in space in order to protect all humankind, especially the unborn, infants, children, adolescents and pregnant women, as well as the environment;
    (b) To follow the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and Council of Europe Resolution 1815 by informing citizens, including teachers and physicians, about the health risks (to adults and children) from RF radiation, and why they should and how they can avoid wireless communication and base stations, particularly in or near day-care centres, schools, hospitals, homes and workplaces;
    © To favour and implement wired telecommunications instead of wireless;
    (d) To prohibit the wireless/telecommunications industry through its lobbying organizations from persuading officials to make decisions permitting further expansion of RF radiation, including ground- and space-based 5G;
    (e) To appoint immediately—without industry influence—international groups of independent, truly impartial EMF and health scientists with no conflicts of interest, for the purpose of establishing new international safety standards for RF radiation that are not based only on power levels, that consider cumulative exposure, and that protect against all health and environmental effects, not just thermal effects and not just effects on humans;
    (f) To appoint immediately—without industry influence—international groups of scientists with expertise in EMFs, health, biology and atmospheric physics, for the purpose of developing a comprehensive regulatory framework that will ensure that the uses of outer space are safe for humans and the environment, taking into account RF radiation, rocket exhaust gases, black soot, and space debris and their impacts on ozone, global warming, the atmosphere and the preservation of life on Earth. Not only ground-based but also space-based technology must be sustainable 123 for adults and children, animals and plants.
    Please respond to the Appeal Administrator listed below, detailing the measures you intend to take to protect the global population against RF radiation exposure, especially 5G radiation. This appeal and your response will be publicly available on
    Respectfully submitted,
    Arthur Firstenberg, Appeal Administrator,
    (Citations, references, and footnotes can be found on the original online text.)
  • Richard Sherwood

    Close to 50,000 have watched this. Think that helps your businesses?
  • Wilson Bustos
    Hello on 30 Even Brown lane they have box sprin mattress tires and other junk for the past month or so.
    Can code enforcement take a look

    Wilson ABC
  • Wilson Bustos
    Hello, On 30 Eben Brown lane a green house… someone with a white honda civic keep driving at high speed around and noice in the afternoons
    Can someone check it out.

    Wilson ABC

    401 808 1984
  • Wilson Bustos
    Can someone pick up phone calls and returns messages….
    1) On 87 hadwin st Dog keep barking for hours. And at times loose with out an owner.

    2) on 61 – 63 cotagge st dogs walk around Eben Brown lane puping around our properties the owner never pick up after his dogs.

    3) on 18 Eben Brown a dog loose at times.

    4) across from 60 Eben Brown lane few people bring their dogs to do their business and dogs has not leash. No one pick up.
    This place smell horrible At times…

    Please take a drive and see it for your self…
    Wilson ABC
    401 808 1984

  • Wilson Bustos
    Greeting, I have been contacting several times Central Falls City hall in person regarding the 60 Eben Brown Ln, Harris nursing facility disposing empty boxes on the side of streets. Is very irresponsible of this facility to do so, in windy days the boxes fly everywhere.
    The Facility also build a huge deck for smokers next to our property the smell of smoke and at times marijuana will blow to our homes is a very disgusting and unhealthy situation.

    Wilson ABC
  • Wilson Bustos
    Greetings, 103-107 Hadwin st empty lot belongs to the Harris nursing facility located on Eben brown lane.,
    I have been cleaning the snow in their sidewalk for many years so kids can wake safe… I complained to the city hall regarding this property Not caring or removing the snow from the sidewalk so kids can walk safe and not walk on the streets and be hit by a car. Hopefully the city get on top of this issue.
  • Wilson Bustos
    Greetings, 103-107 Hadwin st empty lot belongs to the Harris nursing facility located on Eben brown lane.,
    I have been cleaning the snow in their sidewalk so kids can wake safe… I complained to the city hall regarding this property Not caring or removing the snow from the sidewalk so kids can walk safe and not walk on the streets and be hit by a car. Hopefully the city get on top of this issue.
  • Wilson Bustos
    Greetings, 103-107 Hadwin st empty lot belongs to the Harris nursing facility located on Eben brown lane.,
    I have been cleaning the snow in their sidewalk so kids can wake safe… I complained to the city hall regarding this property Not caring or removing the snow from the sidewalk so kids can walk safe and not walk on the streets and be hit by a car. Hopefully the city get on top of this issue.
  • Wilson Bustos
    I really don’t understand how the public workers from the city of central falls manage so poorly a simple situation!!!!
    Manantial Eterno 96 Hadwin St. A nice growing church, who decided to bring a Huge trailer into their parking lot, to teach kids in it violating: fire codes, building regulations, Zoning, doing electricity with out licence, working with out permit, lying to inspector saying was for office, instead of a classroom for kids, etc and the list goes on.
    The city got their money to allow them for zoning, permit, fire codes etc. with out caring about converting our street into a trailer park!!!
    The church relocate the Trailer from the back of their lot to the front of our homes.
    Our homes will devalue, hour street look more ghetto, we lose peace, JOY, and we as Home owners have NOT say….
    People who don’t live in the city come into the city to place business, Organization, church, etc with out a little to NO care or Respect for property owners & residents of the City Central Falls.
    No many city public workers live here in the city so they are careless.
    we request the trailer to be removed, or put it behind their own building, No on from of our homes.
    thank you

    Wilson ABC
  • Wilson Bustos
    The Central falls municipal court clerk office credit card machine is always down to make payments!!!
  • Wilson Bustos
    Greeting, I wonder if the Harris nursing facility requested a permit to build a huge deck so close to our back yard of our property, for the elders, now everyone smokes there and the smell of smoke blows to my home. this is a very disgusting, and unhealthy situation.

    Wilson ABC
  • Wilson Bustos
    Greeting A week ago i contacted Venus, & Elaine partridge in person…regarding the Harris nursing facility disposing empty boxes on the side streets of Eben brown circle. The also park their vehicles all over the side walk or next property of 42 Eben brown, in my opinion is very irresponsible of this facility to do so. we need some action of fines & record to be recorded in file.
    ill look forward to request my complaints withing this week

    Wilson ABC
  • Wilson Bustos
    We as neighbors request that the property owner of 101-103 HADWIN ST Central Falls RI 02863, maintain their property clean at all times and arrange for proper maintenance, including in winter times removing snow from side walk.
    also the property of 73 hadwin st has piles of dirt for the past year.
  • Carmen Baez
    Dear Mayor:
    Sorry to bother you with this, but I don’t know who else to address with my concern. I am writting regarding the water in Central Falls: is it safe to drink out of the faucet, and why the pinkish color that stains everything after the water runs through it? Looking forward to hearing from you. Thank you in advance for your help.

    -Carmen Laura Baez
  • James Richardson
    So there is a new 12 MILLION dollar community health facility that will be build in Central Falls. While the working taxpayer health insurance premiums, copays and deductibles go up, the working Rhode Island CITIZENS are going to be further burdened by paying for a free health care facility for illegal immigrants, drug cartel members and welfare leaches in Central Falls. If this state, and Central Falls in particular would enforce federal immigration laws, maybe CF would not be the poorest city in Rhode Island. Instead, socialist programs continue to force taxpayers to pay for the “poor and hungry” that already benefit from free health care, free food, free lunch for their numerous children in school and free housing. In this state, if you don’t work and live off of handouts and Obamacare you are given everything!! If you work you get nothing. Disgusting.
  • Andy Turenne
    Dear Mayor Diossa,
    I was born and raised in Central Falls and I am a 1960 alumnus of CFHS.
    I just returned to California after a short, one week visit with my family (my sisters) who live at 15 Cliff Street in Central Falls. .
    This is my first visit since 2012 and I am so happy and grateful to see the incredible improvements that have taken place in just four years.
    I left CF in 1960 for a long career in the Air Force and ended up in California, where I’ve lived for the past 32 years. I have such wonderful memories of growing up in CF. I may live in California, but my heart is still in CF and RI. So seeing the ups and downs of my hometown is very moving to me. I am very proud of my little city.
    Please accept my heartfelt thanks and gratitude for all that you and everyone in the city have done to restore and revitalize my hometown.
    Many blessings and continued success to you and your staff.
    Andy Turenne, CFHS Class of 1960
    PS: My sisters think you’re the best thing that’s happened to CF in many, many years. (and so do I)
  • Wilson Bustos
  • kelly valencia
    I would just like to take a minute to say thank you to Mayor Diossa for setting up a tour at the Central Falls fire station and also a thank you to Deputy Sullivan for taking the time to give it to my son today. He enjoyed it and is even more ready to start his journey on joining the firefighter team for CF. Thank you again
  • Joseph Pires
    Dear Mayor:
    You are making a grave mistake in wanting to take in Syrian refugees. Senator Jeff Session has made it very clear that there is no way to vet (background check) these people. They have found that many coming into Europe are not Syrian at all but are coming from multiple Islamic countries to gain access to benefits and accommodations at the expense of taxpayers. Many are Pakistani, Afghani, Tunisian, Libyan and many other countries. We have already 900 cases being investigated by the FBI for possible ties to ISIS terrorist groups. You need to do your homework sir before you do this. The fact of the matter is you do not even have the resources to take care of your own constituency given the bankrupt court that your city just went through. Please reconsider this and check out the latest comments and articles regarding this latest French massacre.
  • Persia Gran-Freeland
    Dear Mayor:
    You are one of many mayors who wants to bring Syrian “refugees” to your city and state. Are you aware that the males begin committng crimes and massive abduction of young girls, raping them, pimping them out until they become pregnant with Muslim babies immediately after they reach your city and state?
    Go to Pamela Geller’s daily column ( and read at least 10 articles of what the Muslims are doing to people and everywhere they are accepted.
    Obama does not care. He is a born and bred Muslim and his loyalties are to them, first and foremost. Read the proof of this in the following article and legal documents which you can find on the web:

    11‎/‎14‎/‎2015‎ ‎6‎:‎58‎:‎41‎ ‎PM
    By Doctor Whodini

    VNN Exclusive Report: Obama’s Real Birth Certificate
    Friday, November 13, 2015 12:00

    Get FREE private and secure Email and Messaging click now!
    (Before It’s News)
    VNN (Vortex Network News) was approached by a whistleblower that had the REAL birth documents of President Barack Hussein Obama II:
    Obama’s legal name is Barak Hussein Soetero (adopted by Stanley’s 2nd husband, an Indonesian Muslim man). Obama’s birth father, Barack Hussein Obama Sr was also a Muslim. Under Islam, a child is ALWAYS the religion of the father. Under Judaism, a child is a Jew through the mother, regardless of whether they convert later or not. A Jew is a Jew is a Jew. Same with Islam. Even though Obama may state he is ‘Christian’, under the rules of Islam, he is Muslim and will always be Muslim because he was born into a Muslim family.
    A British history buff was asked if he could find out who the colonial registrar was for Mombasa in 1961. After only a few minutes of research, he called back and said “Sir Edward F. Lavender Note the same name near the bottom of the photo above. Source(s): Kenya Dominion Record 4667 Australian library.

    ” And here is a close-up of the bottom of the document where you can read “Coast Providence of Kenya “ and the Official signature of the Deputy Registrar….. The above document is a “Certified Copy of Registration of Birth”, but below is a copy of the actual Certificate of Birth…

    The real-deal legal kind of certificate. The Mombasa Registrar of Births has testified that Obama’s birth certificate from Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa is genuine. This copy was obtained by Lucas Smith through the help of a Kenyan Colonel who recently got it Directly from the Coast General Hospital in Mombasa , Kenya .. Here it is ;;;….. Note the footprint!! The local Muslim Imam in Mombasa named Barack with his Muslim middle name Hussein so his official name on this certificate is Barack Hussein Obama II.

    The grandmother of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. Reveals the story of his birth in Mombasa , Kenya , a seaport, after his mother suffered labor pains while swimming at ocean beach in Mombasa ….

    “On August 4, 1961 Obama’s mother, father and grandmother were attending a Muslim festival in Mombasa , Kenya .. Mother had been refused entry to airplanes due to her nine month pregnancy. It was a hot August day at the festival so the Obama s went to the beach to Cool off. While swimming in the ocean his mother experienced labor pains so was rushed to the Coast Provincial General Hospital , Mombasa , Kenya where Obama was born a few hours later at 7:21 PM on August 4, 1961(what a sad day for the USA !). Four days later his mother flew to Hawaii and registered his birth in Honolulu as a certificate of live birth which omitted the place and hospital of birth.”

    Letter from Kitau in Mombasa , Kenya ……. “I happen to be Kenyan. I was born 1 month before Obama at Mombasa medical center. I am a teacher here at the MM Shaw Primary School in Kenya . I compared my birth certificate to the one that has been put out by Taitz and mine is exactly the same. I even have the same registrar and format.

    The type is identical. I am by nature a skeptical person. I teach science here and challenge most things that cannot be proven.

    So I went to an official registrar today and pulled up the picture on the web. They magnified it and determined it to be authentic. There is even a plaque with Registrar Lavenders name on it as he was a Brit and was in charge of the Registrar office from 1959 until January of 1964.

    The reason the date on the certificate says republic of Kenya is that we were a republic when the “copy” of the original was ordered. I stress the word “copy”. My copy also has republic of Kenya .

    So what you say is true about Kenya not being a republic at the time of Obama’s birth, however it was a republic when the copy was ordered. The birth certificate is genuine. I assure you it will be authenticated by a forensic auditor.

    We are very proud Obama was born here. We have a shrine for him and there are many people who remember his birth here as he had a white mother. They are being interviewed now by one of your media outlets.

    Fortunately they even have pictures of his parents with him immediately after his birth at the Mombasa hospital with the hospital in the back ground. It will be a proud day for us when it is proven that he was born here and a Kenyan became the most powerful man in the world.

    I encourage anyone to come here and visit. I will be happy to take you and show you the pictures at the hospital myself as well as my documents and many others that are identical to what Taitz posted. God Bless. Kitau”

    So, how much more proof do we need ? Well , Here it is…{SJC} Lolo Soetoro, Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro, baby Maya Soetoro, and 9 year old Barry Soetoro. This registration document, made available on Jan. 24, 2007, by the Fransiskus Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia , shows the registration of Barack Obama under the name Barry Soetoro made by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro.
    Name: Barry Soetoro Religion: Islam Nationality: Indonesian How did this little INDONESIAN Muslim child – Barry Soetoro, ( A.K.A. Barack Obama ) get around the issue of nationality to become President of the United States of America ?

    PART 2 : In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama’s qualifications for the presidency, the group “Americans for Freedom of Information” has released copies of President Obama’s college transcripts from Occidental College ….

    The transcript indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia while an undergraduate at the school. The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California .

    The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify for this scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.

    This document provides the smoking gun that many of Obama’s detractors have been seeking – that he is NOT a natural-born citizen of the United States – necessary to be President of these United States !! Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya, here we see that there is no record of him ever applying for US citizenship. !!. Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results of their investigation of Obama’s campaign spending.

    This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of his personal records !!. Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still on-going but that the final report will be provided to the U.S. attorney general, Eric Holder. And Mr. Holder has refused comment on this matter !!

    It is interesting to note the FBI, CIA and NSA all know about these documents, and are choosing to do nothing on the basis that it may cause a national security threat.
    Portions copyright © 2013 Before It’s News Inc., All Rights Reserved.
    Bfore It’s News® is a registered Service Mark of Before I
    Rethink your decision if your value the satety and well-being of your city and state and especially of your little girls and young women.
    Persia Gran-Freeland
  • Luz Filpo
    Wonderful page, congratulations!
    Please include me in the email list

    Thank you!